Cuban agriculture
We run various sites in defense of human rights and need support in paying for servers. Thank you.
Translate
EnglishFrenchGermanItalianPortugueseRussianSpanish
Recent Comments

Cuba’s sustainable agriculture at risk in U.S. thaw

Cuba’s sustainable agriculture at risk in U.S. thaw
March 25, 2016 9.39am GMT
Author Miguel Altieri
Professor of Agroecology, University of California, Berkeley

Disclosure statement
Miguel Altieri does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive
funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this
article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond the academic
appointment above.
Partners
University of California provides funding as a founding partner of The
Conversation US.

President Obama’s trip to Cuba this week accelerated the warming of
U.S.-Cuban relations. Many people in both countries believe that
normalizing relations will spur investment that can help Cuba develop
its economy and improve life for its citizens.

But in agriculture, U.S. investment could cause harm instead.

For the past 35 years I have studied agroecology in most countries in
Central and South America. Agroecology is an approach to farming that
developed in the late 1970s in Latin America as a reaction against the
top-down, technology-intensive and environmentally destructive strategy
that characterizes modern industrial agriculture. It encourages local
production by small-scale farmers, using sustainable strategies and
combining Western knowledge with traditional expertise.

Cuba took this approach out of necessity when its economic partner, the
Soviet bloc, dissolved in the early 1990s. As a result, Cuban farming
has become a leading example of ecological agriculture.

But if relations with U.S. agribusiness companies are not managed
carefully, Cuba could revert to an industrial approach that relies on
mechanization, transgenic crops and agrochemicals, rolling back the
revolutionary gains that its campesinos have achieved.

The shift to peasant agroecology

For several decades after Cuba’s 1959 revolution, socialist bloc
countries accounted for nearly all of its foreign trade.

The government devoted 30 percent of agricultural land to sugarcane for
export, while importing 57 percent of Cuba’s food supply. Farmers relied
on tractors, massive amounts of pesticide and fertilizer inputs, all
supplied by Soviet bloc countries. By the 1980s agricultural pests were
increasing, soil quality was degrading and yields of some key crops like
rice had begun to decline.

When Cuban trade with the Soviet bloc ended in the early 1990s, food
production collapsed due to the loss of imported fertilizers,
pesticides, tractors and petroleum. The situation was so bad that Cuba
posted the worst growth in per capita food production in all of Latin
America and the Caribbean.

But then farmers started adopting agroecological techniques, with
support from Cuban scientists.

Thousands of oxen replaced tractors that could not function due to lack
of petroleum and spare parts. Farmers substituted green manures for
chemical fertilizers and artisanally produced biopesticides for
insecticides. At the same time, Cuban policymakers adopted a range of
agrarian reform and decentralization policies that encouraged forms of
production where groups of farmers grow and market their produce
collectively.

As Cuba reoriented its agriculture to depend less on imported chemical
inputs and imported equipment, food production rebounded. From 1996
though 2005, per capita food production in Cuba increased by 4.2 percent
yearly during a period when production was stagnant across Latin America
and the Caribbean.

In the mid-2000s, the Ministry of Agriculture dismantled all
“inefficient state companies” and government-owned farms, endorsed the
creation of 2,600 new small urban and suburban farms, and allowed
farming on some three million hectares of unused state lands.

Urban gardens, which first sprang up during the economic crisis of the
early 1990s, have developed into an important food source.

Today Cuba has 383,000 urban farms, covering 50,000 hectares of
otherwise unused land and producing more than 1.5 million tons of
vegetables. The most productive urban farms yield up to 20 kg of food
per square meter, the highest rate in the world, using no synthetic
chemicals. Urban farms supply 50 to 70 percent or more of all the fresh
vegetables consumed in cities such as Havana and Villa Clara.

The risks of opening up

Now Cuba’s agriculture system is under increasing pressure to deliver
harvests for export and for Cuba’s burgeoning tourist markets. Part of
the production is shifting away from feeding local and regional markets,
and increasingly focusing on feeding tourists and producing organic
tropical products for export.

President Obama hopes to open the door for U.S. businesses to sell goods
to Cuba. In Havana last Monday during Obama’s visit, U.S. Agriculture
Secretary Tom Vilsack signed an agreement with his Cuban counterpart,
Agriculture Minister Gustavo Rodriguez Rollero, to promote sharing of
ideas and research.

“U.S. producers are eager to help meet Cuba’s need for healthy, safe,
nutritious food,” Vilsack said. The U.S. Agriculture Coalition for Cuba,
which was launched in 2014 to lobby for an end to the U.S.-Cuba trade
embargo, includes more than 100 agricultural companies and trade groups.
Analysts estimate that U.S. agricultural exports to Cuba could reach
US$1.2 billion if remaining regulations are relaxed and trade barriers
are lifted, a market that U.S. agribusiness wants to capture.

When agribusinesses invest in developing countries, they seek economies
of scale. This encourages concentration of land in the hands of a few
corporations and standardization of small-scale production systems. In
turn, these changes force small farmers off of their lands and lead to
the abandonment of local crops and traditional farming ways. The
expansion of transgenic crops and agrofuels in Brazil, Paraguay and
Bolivia since the 1990s are examples of this process.

If U.S. industrial agriculture expands into Cuba, there is a risk that
it could destroy the complex social network of agroecological small
farms that more than 300,000 campesinos have built up over the past
several decades through farmer-to-farmer horizontal exchanges of knowledge.

This would reduce the diversity of crops that Cuba produces and harm
local economies and food security. If large businesses displace
small-scale farmers, agriculture will move toward export crops,
increasing the ranks of unemployed. There is nothing wrong with small
farmers capturing a share of export markets, as long as it does not mean
neglecting their roles as local food producers. The Cuban government
thus will have to protect campesinos by not importing food products that
peasants produce.

Cuba still imports some of its food, including U.S. products such as
poultry and soybean meal. Since agricultural sales to Cuba were
legalized in 2000, U.S. agricultural exports have totaled about $5
billion. However, yearly sales have fallen from a high of $658 million
in 2008 to $300 million in 2014.

U.S. companies would like to regain some of the market share that they
have lost to the European Union and Brazil.

There is broad debate over how heavily Cuba relies on imports to feed
its population: the U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates that
imports make up 60 to 80 percent of Cubans’ caloric intake, but other
assessments are much lower.

In fact, Cuba has the potential to produce enough food with
agroecological methods to feed its 11 million inhabitants. Cuba has
about six million hectares of fairly level land and another million
gently sloping hectares that can be used for cropping. More than half of
this land remains uncultivated, and the productivity of both land and
labor, as well as the efficiency of resource use, in the rest of this
farm area are still low.

We have calculated that if all peasant farms and cooperatives adopted
diversified agroecological designs, Cuba would be able to produce enough
to feed its population, supply food to the tourist industry and even
export some food to help generate foreign currency.

President Raul Castro has stated that while opening relations with the
U.S. has some benefits,

We will not renounce our ideals of independence and social justice, or
surrender even a single one of our principles, or concede a millimeter
in the defense of our national sovereignty. We have won this sovereign
right with great sacrifices and at the cost of great risks.
Cuba’s small farmers control only 25 percent of the nation’s
agricultural land but produce over 65 percent of the country’s food,
contributing significantly to the island’s sovereignity. Their
agroecological achievements represent a true legacy of Cuba’s revolution.

Source: Cuba’s sustainable agriculture at risk in U.S. thaw –
theconversation.com/cubas-sustainable-agriculture-at-risk-in-u-s-thaw-56773

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Calendar
March 2016
M T W T F S S
« Feb   Apr »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  
Archives