Cuban agriculture
We run various sites in defense of human rights and need support in paying for servers. Thank you.
Translate
EnglishFrenchGermanItalianPortugueseRussianSpanish
Recent Comments

The Cuban quandary

The Cuban quandary
By Ben Potter April 20, 2016 | 2:29 pm EDT

Some don’t want to trade with the Communist country, but market upsides
await.

Cuba is an island nation that depends on imports to feed its populace.
Recently, President Barack Obama became the first president to visit
Cuba since Calvin Coolidge. The end goal: easing trade restrictions that
have lasted five decades. But will it really lead to new market
opportunities for U.S. farmers?

The fact Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack was also on the trip is a
good indicator. Vilsack announced USDA will begin sharing agricultural
research, market information and more.

“Recognizing the importance of agriculture in the U.S. and Cuba, USDA is
advancing a new partnership for the 21st century between our two
countries,” Vilsack said in a statement. “The agreements we reached with
our Cuban counterparts on this historic trip, and the ability for our
agriculture sector leaders to communicate with Cuban businesses, will
help U.S. agricultural interests better understand the Cuban market,
while also providing the Cuban people with science-based information as
they [plan to] grow their own agriculture sector.”

Those against opening trade with Cuba argue the morals of doing business
with a Communist country. But others, such as Lee Ann Evans, senior
policy adviser with Engage Cuba, says this policy is increasingly
antiquated and unnecessary.

“Cuba has been strangely a country that we treat differently for reasons
that are no longer legitimate,” she says.

President Obama has done what he can while still fulfilling the law,
Evans says. However, unlike most sanctions, the Cuba sanctions were
codified into law in 1996, so it will require legislative action to
become undone.

Doing so could have positive economic consequences for U.S. agriculture,
Evans says. The U.S. supplies around 80% of agricultural imports to most
other Caribbean nations.

“We’re looking at about a $2 billion import market on average,” she says.

Some agriculture sectors are already reaping the benefits of relaxed
trade with Cuba. The poultry industry, for example, is an exception to
the current embargoes, and Cuba is currently the fifth-largest export
market for U.S. poultry producers. Proximity plays a major role in the
numbers, according to Jim Sumner, president of the USA Poultry and Egg
Export Council.

“They can place an order on a Monday and have the product on a Friday,
if they need it,” Sumner told Bloomberg. “If they buy it from Europe or
Brazil, it’s going to be 20 to 30 days.”

Arkansas Rep. Rick Crawford points out his state’s rice growers would
have a similar competitive advantage, delivering grain in 36 hours
versus 36 days from Vietnam.

According to USDA, other commodities with the highest upside include
wheat, corn, rice and dairy. Many commodity groups have publicly
supported an end to the embargo.

“Trade between Cuba and the U.S. is a win-win situation primarily
because of the close proximity to one another,” says Ron Suppes, a
Kansas farmer and president of U.S. Wheat Associates. “Fifty years is a
long time. It is time to drop the embargo.”

Source: The Cuban quandary | Dairy Herd Management –
www.dairyherd.com/news/industry/cuban-quandary

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Calendar
April 2016
M T W T F S S
« Mar   May »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930  
Archives